Insights · Direct booking

Direct is now the minority channel for independent hotels. That is a pricing problem before it is a marketing one.

Direct booking is discussed as a marketing problem and is usually a pricing, presentation and measurement problem. This article sets out where independent hotels actually stand, why the gap persists, and the order of work that moves it, based on what we see when we take properties apart.

Hotel manager welcoming guests with bicycles at a Copenhagen hotel entrance
63%of independent-hotel bookings came through marketplaces in 2025
51%of European overnights are still booked directly across all channels, including phone and walk-in
3.5–7%the cost of a direct booking through your own engine and payments, against 15 to 25 percent base commission on a marketplace

Where independents actually stand

Cloudbeds, reading 90 million bookings, put marketplace share of independent-hotel bookings at 63.4 percent for 2025, with direct as the residual and still falling as a share of online revenue. HOTREC's European work shows the other half of the picture: across all channels, including telephone, walk-in and repeat, roughly half of European overnights are still direct. The direct habit exists. What has been lost is the online part of it, to properties that present better and to channels that present relentlessly.

Why the gap persists

The rate is not actually comparable

A guest comparing your site against a marketplace is comparing two numbers that mean different things: one with taxes shown, one without; one with breakfast, one without; one with free cancellation, one not. If your own site does not make the whole cost and the whole inclusion obvious in the first screen, the comparison resolves against you regardless of the underlying price.

The path is longer

Marketplaces have spent a decade removing steps. An independent booking engine on a different domain, asking for an account, hiding the room list behind a calendar, and taking eleven seconds to load on a phone, is competing against two seconds and three taps.

The measurement is broken, so the media is mispriced

Because bookings jump to the engine's domain, a large share of direct bookings are recorded as direct traffic or as a self-referral. The property then under-invests in the channels that actually work, because they appear not to. We cover the mechanics of this in a separate piece.

The order that works

Direct share moves in a specific sequence, and doing it out of order wastes money.

  1. Parity first. If your own rate is undercut on the dates you are advertising, everything downstream leaks.
  2. Then the path. Room pages that answer the question, whole-cost rates, a booking flow that works with one thumb.
  3. Then measurement. Tracking that survives the engine hop, so the next decision is made on evidence.
  4. Then demand. Search, AI visibility, metasearch and paid media, bought against a cost per direct booking you can now actually see.
  5. Then retention. The guest list you have been collecting and not using, which is the cheapest direct demand available to you.

What direct share is worth

At a 20 percent all-in marketplace cost against a direct cost at the middle of the 3.5 to 7 percent range, every point of revenue moved is worth roughly 14 percent of that revenue, straight to the operating line. For a property with a million in room revenue, ten points of shift is around £14,000 a year, before counting the lower cancellation rate and the value of owning the guest relationship. That is the size of the prize, and it is why the work is worth sequencing properly rather than buying campaigns.

Questions this raises

Is a higher direct share always better?
No. Direct share is a means, not an end. A property that pushes direct share by discounting has simply moved the cost from commission to rate. The number that matters is contribution after distribution cost.
How long does it take to move?
Parity and booking-path work show up within a quarter. Visibility and retention compound over two to four quarters. We set day-90 measures so you can tell early whether it is working.
Does this apply to resorts and villas too?
More so. The further a guest travels and the larger the booking, the more a point of direct share is worth, and the more intermediated most of those properties are.
Sources
  1. Cloudbeds, State of Independent Hotels 2026, from 90 million bookings, March 2026.
  2. HOTREC, European hospitality distribution study, 2023.
  3. D-EDGE, channel-mix reporting, 2023 to 2025.
  4. Silvengate property diagnostics, 2026.
Related services

Where this usually leads

More insights

Also from the research base

What do the engines say about your business?

Request the Business Scan